Skip to content

Electrical Methods

Electrical resistivity spans more orders of magnitude than any other rock property, which makes current-based methods the workhorses of environmental geophysics. This module covers galvanic resistivity surveying (VES and ERT), the passive self-potential (SP) method, and induced polarization (IP).

Learning Objectives

Undergraduate Core: By the end of this module, you will be able to:

  • Explain electrolytic conduction and the roles of saturation, salinity, porosity, clay, and temperature.
  • Calculate geometric factors and distinguish true, apparent, and inverted resistivity.
  • Compare Wenner, Schlumberger, and dipole–dipole survey behavior.
  • Distinguish ERT, SP, and IP mechanisms and avoid treating any response as a unique hydrologic property.
Graduate Extension

Examine sensitivity functions, regularization, equivalence, Cole–Cole conventions, and uncertainty in petrophysical conversion from resistivity to water content.

Practice this module Teach with active-learning slides

Interactive Lecture

Topic Apps

Demo

Classroom Lab

🧰 Three-layer VES group investigation — divide into curve-type, suppression, and equivalence teams, then explain why apparent resistivity and electrode spacing are not a literal depth section.

Research Code: PyHydroGeophysX

From resistivity to water content

The petrophysics in this module (Archie's law, and its clay-corrected cousin the Waxman-Smits model) is exactly how field ERT becomes hydrology. PyHydroGeophysX, developed in Dr. Chen's group, implements these transforms together with full 2D and 3D ERT forward modeling and inversion, including time-lapse and structure-constrained inversion for watershed monitoring.

Background reading: Archie (1942), Loke et al. (2013), and Binley & Slater (2020) on the References page.

Data and Notebooks

  • 📊 Datasets live in the Data area.
  • 🚀 Python exercises (including pyGIMLi-based forward modeling) are in Notebooks.